The Trump Presidency

Do you ...


  • Total voters
    149
Status
Not open for further replies.
Meadows-_Paul-_Gohmert-_Lee-420x315.jpg


Job well done , Lee, Meadows, Gohmert, Paul. Brat..

You put the liberals on the heads because they desperately wanted to be let off of the hook.

Now on to a real repeal once Ryan is gone.

Which will be before Easter.

:D

the same David Brat who knocked off Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor?

Go Brat!
 
Let's get a score update, shall we?


The bill is not going to pass dumbfuck.

They will own healthcare if it passes. It will be a rough 4-8 years. Just ask the Democrats

Is it really a shocker that a GOP crafted health care bill would be geared towards benefiting the wealthy? I can already tell you what their tax reform plan will look like. It's going to be a giveaway to the wealthy. These are givens

Oh don't get me wrong. As much of a clusterfuck this health care bill is, I think it's going to pass by the slimmest of margins tomorrow. These Freedom Caucus members say they're voting no but I just don't think they have the cojones to actually go through with it.

:1orglaugh
 
*Ahem*

Sorry about your brother..

But Obamacare isn't saving people from medical bankruptcy.

Thanks BC

Seems only logical to me it's saving a lot of those who find themselves in a situation like his from bankruptcy.

why 26? What about those 27-year-olds who are thrown out on their own who develop a serious medical condition? Why not 30? Heck, why not make it as long as you're still living in your parents' basement (regardless of age) you can still stay on their plan?

26 was probably the oldest possible age conservatives wouldn't have unanimously pissed their pants over.
Frankly I'm surprised they didn't insist on 22. In the no-shades-of-grey world of conservatism that's the age by which all who attend college should have graduated, to be followed immediately by obtaining gainful and secure employment. But perhaps they grudgingly considered that people seeking post graduate degrees might benefit from another four years.
 
Thanks BC

Seems only logical to me it's saving a lot of those who find themselves in a situation like his from bankruptcy.



26 was probably the oldest possible age conservatives wouldn't have unanimously pissed their pants over.
Frankly I'm surprised they didn't insist on 22. In the no-shades-of-grey world of conservatism that's the age by which all who attend college should have graduated, to be followed immediately by obtaining gainful and secure employment. But perhaps they grudgingly considered that people seeking post graduate degrees might benefit from another four years.

but wasn't Obamacare passed with a majority democrat house and senate? and on strict partisan lines? what input did conservatives have at all in it? They tried to offer their suggestions but were smugly smacked down by Obama saying "I won. Elections have consequences."

Please tell me if I'm wrong.
 
Please tell me if I'm wrong.

I can't say that you are. But I seem to recall that a lot of the framework for Obamacare was based on Romneycare; legislation that included input from the right. I also imagine (could be wrong) that in order to (hopefully) give Obamacare longevity there were some considerations made based on what degree of blowback might or might not result down the line based on traditional conservative ideology. In other words even though it was a highly partisan procedure I don't think it devolved into a case of simply rapturously and irresponsibly sticking it to the right. But again that was just my impression, and I could be wrong.

Whatever the case may be, imo something effective has got to be done about pre-existing condition exemptions. They're a national nightmare.
 
I can't say that you are. But I seem to recall that a lot of the framework for Obamacare was based on Romneycare; legislation that included input from the right. I also imagine (could be wrong) that in order to (hopefully) give Obamacare longevity there were some considerations made based on what degree of blowback might or might not result down the line based on traditional conservative ideology. In other words even though it was a highly partisan procedure I don't think it devolved into a case of simply rapturously and irresponsibly sticking it to the right. But again that was just my impression, and I could be wrong.

Whatever the case may be, imo something effective has got to be done about pre-existing condition exemptions. They're a national nightmare.

We're not heartless bastards. Mark Levin said he told Paul Ryan to repeal, then come back with a voucher system for the poor and indigent that would cost about 25 billion a year. Still cheaper than Medicaid subsidies and they get to be a part of the free market.

Win for everyone and we get back control of who we purchase from and premiums will be lowered.

Some on the left still don't want it because healthcare is not about health, it is about control.
 
I can't say that you are. But I seem to recall that a lot of the framework for Obamacare was based on Romneycare; legislation that included input from the right. I also imagine (could be wrong) that in order to (hopefully) give Obamacare longevity there were some considerations made based on what degree of blowback might or might not result down the line based on traditional conservative ideology. In other words even though it was a highly partisan procedure I don't think it devolved into a case of simply rapturously and irresponsibly sticking it to the right. But again that was just my impression, and I could be wrong.

Whatever the case may be, imo something effective has got to be done about pre-existing condition exemptions. They're a national nightmare.

you brought up Romney and Romneycare when we were talking about conservatives.

the Heritage Foundation in the late 80's in 3 ... 2.... 1.

you purchase insurance and the insurance company and their actuaries tabulate the risk/cost in case something happens, not after the fact.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Some are saying this was a chess move by Trump to let Ryan fuck it up and take the fall.
Then Trump can give him the boot and have it done right.
Well its better to kill a bad bill and wait for a good one rather than just accept a pile of shit just because its delivered quick.
 

Rane1071

For the EMPEROR!!
I'm not always a Bill Maher fan but I think he nailed it pretty close to the bone there.

Yeah, he has a way of cutting to the chase doesn't he. I never really cared for him, but have warmed up to him the past couple of years.
 
Why exactly are so much politicians and citizens in the US against government run universal health care? Imo health care is not something that should be left to companies that value profit more than human lives.
 

Republicans have holds Senate, House, White House, Supreme Court and States, they've been ranting against Obamacare since Obama got i passed (an even before), they tried to repeal it o numerous occasions while Obama was in office, they promised that once they will be in office, Obamlacare would be gone, Trump beven said he would repeal it on day 1. Ad now Republicans ghold the White House, the Senate, the House, the Supreme Courty and most of the sates, they can't get along and come up with a suibstitution bill that they would agree on ?! And then you guys have the guts to call that "winning" ?
:picardfacepalm:


The truth is GOP donors such as the koch bros wanted a way more harsh bill but some GOP senatours realised that most of their voters did like ObamaCare and they didn't wanted to be called out when these voters would realised that becvause of them they lost their healthcare coverage


Trump won because, unlike previous other gop candidates, unlike Mitt Romney, he ran a populous campaign, he talked t the people instead of the donors. But this is not how republicans use to do politics, theu use to take campaign financing froml big donors and then do their biddigs (just like establishment democrats, just not the same donors).


So in the end, this was a match between Trump and the Koch Bros and it ended in a a draw. But most of the american people don't know the koch bros were in that game, so to most american people, Trump's got tackled, 5 yards from the touchdown, by one of his team-members
 

Republicans have holds Senate, House, White House, Supreme Court and States, they've been ranting against Obamacare since Obama got i passed (an even before), they tried to repeal it o numerous occasions while Obama was in office, they promised that once they will be in office, Obamlacare would be gone, Trump beven said he would repeal it on day 1. Ad now Republicans ghold the White House, the Senate, the House, the Supreme Courty and most of the sates, they can't get along and come up with a suibstitution bill that they would agree on ?! And then you guys have the guts to call that "winning" ?
:picardfacepalm:


The truth is GOP donors such as the koch bros wanted a way more harsh bill but some GOP senatours realised that most of their voters did like ObamaCare and they didn't wanted to be called out when these voters would realised that becvause of them they lost their healthcare coverage


Trump won because, unlike previous other gop candidates, unlike Mitt Romney, he ran a populous campaign, he talked t the people instead of the donors. But this is not how republicans use to do politics, theu use to take campaign financing froml big donors and then do their biddigs (just like establishment democrats, just not the same donors).


So in the end, this was a match between Trump and the Koch Bros and it ended in a a draw. But most of the american people don't know the koch bros were in that game, so to most american people, Trump's got tackled, 5 yards from the touchdown, by one of his team-members

If you are going to be stupid, please break it up so there isn't so much stupid to try and sort out in one post.

First, let's establish one thing..
You don't know one thing about how the American legislative process works.

I've tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, even through all of the spelling errors and since English isn't your first language, we cut you some slack because you seem eager to learn.

You look at the parties very simplistically, it's almost scary as to how you view Democrats and Republicans.

The GOP is fractured. If you don't understand that then there is no sense in reading beyond this.

60 percent of the GOP is made up of people whose philosophy would be considered a Democrat 25 years ago.
Don't believe me?

Look at Bill Clinton's State of the union speech in 1994.

Now we are left with 35-40 percent remaining of constitutional conservatives, staunch originalists, small government, types.

They have never been in the majority in congress, let me emphasize this..never ever have constitutional conservatives controlled any majority in congress that means the house or Senate.

So you can beat your chest and taunt about the bill failing, but constitutional conservatives were on your side but for completely different reasons.

Paul Ryan is a globalist corporatist liberal Republican, I still chuckle when a certain poster here claimed that he didn't vote for Romney because Ryan was too conservative for him. I should have stopped taking him seriously after that but I didn't listen to my better judgement.

He created a bill that was essentially took away the mandate for having insurance but left the burden on insurance companies to provide coverage for preexisting conditions and for adult children.

A recipe for disaster, but this time they assume Obamacare, sign off on it and allow it to be their baby. Letting Democrats off of the hook.
It is like assuming the mortgage on beach front property that is in the process of falling into the sea.

The Democrats however, are united. Their philosophy of big government, open borders is shared throughout the party. In fact I would doubt if 10 percent of the democrat party didn't agree with the liberals-socialists.

So in 2010, you had a united party, creating a bill as opposed to 2017 a fractured party where the liberal/moderate wing and leadership creates a bill.

That's why it didn't pass.

You had several self appointed experts on this thread saying it would pass when it wouldn't.

You had some dancing on the graves of Republicans for passing it before they passed it only look like fools and being reduced to posting photos to troll because they don't have anything substantive to add or are too dense to understand the complex nuances of the GOP.

What will happen next and I believe it will be before Easter is that there will be a new speaker and new house leadership.

Then a new bill that is a real repeal of Obamacare will be offered and it will be successful.

Trump's agenda is not conducive to working with liberal Republicans like Ryan.

Once he is gone, and Gorsuch is seated, it is full steam ahead.

My accuracy is better than most here.

So I am confident I will be proven correct again.
 

Ah yes, enter the commentary of a extreme left wing entertainer.

I guess I could post video after video of right wing opinion of what a bang up job Obama did.

And what exactly about my post was inaccurate?

But I understand your motivation. These things are quite therapeutic for you and your ilk.

Well, if it keeps you from starving yourself with hunger strikes and making foolish video streams with "He will not divide us " flags, then I guess it was worth it.

I even watched the video and chuckled a few times because unlike most left-wing entertainers/comedians (Schumer, Handler, Noah) Maher can be intellectually honest and funny at times.

The funny thing is..just when I think Trump might be fucking up..

I remember that you guys wanted this...



talk about con games :1orglaugh.

So in the end..your side didn't have any alternative to what we have now other than a shrill, lying phony with no regard for national security, entitled ,criminal, who failed at every opportunity she was given.

Suddenly I don't feel so bad.

I think I'll check out Bill's show in its entirety later today.

Thanks.
 
When people ask me about my favorite tune, I tell them: It's Blue Countach whistling in the dark. :1orglaugh


https://www.facebook.com/spiegelonline/videos/10155267049944869/

Hey dipshit! I was on record as opposing Ryancare.

Whistling in the dark is not the case here. Perhaps you should educate yourself as to what it really means.

Which means I opposed Trump on this issue.

Don't you have some female family members you should be protecting from migrant rapeugees right about now?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top